🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized professional network test this week following viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."