As a Hardcore Capitalist, Yet Universal Medicare Is the Best Hope for US Health System
Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.
Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.
Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive
Based on a recent study, the average family pays $27,000 annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.
Now federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.
When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?
When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.
I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.
How Universal Coverage Could Function
A national health insurance program would require payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee making moderate income pays approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about 13.75%.
Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast that with what average American pays. I can name multiple clients that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When you add those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.
Execution in the US
For America, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and company payments. Similar to many our government's defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.
Advantages for Entrepreneurs
A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).
It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with major insurers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and different options.
Free-Market Viewpoint
I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.
Considering Challenges
Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.
Need for Honest Assessment
We as Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid current situation is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes are necessary.